tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25
2
0
Issues 1.1k Wiki Activity

bugs -> tickets 

[Imported from Trac: page Packaging, version 29]
davidsarah 2011-07-17 23:24:20 +00:00
parent 6cadce5c2c
commit 08b1946114
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
Packaging.md

@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Disadvantages:
* setuptools has many bugs and is poorly maintained. * setuptools has many bugs and is poorly maintained.
* these bugs affect Tahoe-LAFS disproportionately because it has more, and more complicated, dependencies than most Python packages. We currently have [count)](TicketQuery)(status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools, open setuptools-related bugs ([full list]query:status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools) and have closed [count)](TicketQuery)(status=closed&keywords~=setuptools, such bugs ([full list]query:status=closed&keywords~=setuptools). (These counts may be a bit high because of duplicates and non-bugs, but they're indicative of the problem.) * these bugs affect Tahoe-LAFS disproportionately because it has more, and more complicated, dependencies than most Python packages. We currently have [count)](TicketQuery)(status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools, open setuptools-related tickets ([full list]query:status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools) and have closed [count)](TicketQuery)(status=closed&keywords~=setuptools, such tickets ([full list]query:status=closed&keywords~=setuptools). (These counts may be a bit high because of duplicates and non-bugs, but they're indicative of the problem.)
* maintaining our fork (which is necessary to avoid some of the bugs) takes up developer time and mental bandwidth that would be more productively spent on Tahoe-LAFS itself. * maintaining our fork (which is necessary to avoid some of the bugs) takes up developer time and mental bandwidth that would be more productively spent on Tahoe-LAFS itself.