From 08b1946114a6367c983433a951600041e1dedf8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: davidsarah <>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:24:20 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] bugs -> tickets

[Imported from Trac: page Packaging, version 29]
---
 Packaging.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Packaging.md b/Packaging.md
index dde7511..7f058c8 100644
--- a/Packaging.md
+++ b/Packaging.md
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Disadvantages:
 
  * setuptools has many bugs and is poorly maintained.
 
- * these bugs affect Tahoe-LAFS disproportionately because it has more, and more complicated, dependencies than most Python packages. We currently have [count)](TicketQuery)(status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools, open setuptools-related bugs ([full list]query:status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools) and have closed [count)](TicketQuery)(status=closed&keywords~=setuptools, such bugs ([full list]query:status=closed&keywords~=setuptools). (These counts may be a bit high because of duplicates and non-bugs, but they're indicative of the problem.)
+ * these bugs affect Tahoe-LAFS disproportionately because it has more, and more complicated, dependencies than most Python packages. We currently have [count)](TicketQuery)(status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools, open setuptools-related tickets ([full list]query:status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools) and have closed [count)](TicketQuery)(status=closed&keywords~=setuptools, such tickets ([full list]query:status=closed&keywords~=setuptools). (These counts may be a bit high because of duplicates and non-bugs, but they're indicative of the problem.)
 
  * maintaining our fork (which is necessary to avoid some of the bugs) takes up developer time and mental bandwidth that would be more productively spent on Tahoe-LAFS itself.