bugs -> tickets
[Imported from Trac: page Packaging, version 29]
parent
6cadce5c2c
commit
08b1946114
|
@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Disadvantages:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* setuptools has many bugs and is poorly maintained.
|
* setuptools has many bugs and is poorly maintained.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* these bugs affect Tahoe-LAFS disproportionately because it has more, and more complicated, dependencies than most Python packages. We currently have [count)](TicketQuery)(status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools, open setuptools-related bugs ([full list]query:status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools) and have closed [count)](TicketQuery)(status=closed&keywords~=setuptools, such bugs ([full list]query:status=closed&keywords~=setuptools). (These counts may be a bit high because of duplicates and non-bugs, but they're indicative of the problem.)
|
* these bugs affect Tahoe-LAFS disproportionately because it has more, and more complicated, dependencies than most Python packages. We currently have [count)](TicketQuery)(status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools, open setuptools-related tickets ([full list]query:status!=closed&keywords~=setuptools) and have closed [count)](TicketQuery)(status=closed&keywords~=setuptools, such tickets ([full list]query:status=closed&keywords~=setuptools). (These counts may be a bit high because of duplicates and non-bugs, but they're indicative of the problem.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* maintaining our fork (which is necessary to avoid some of the bugs) takes up developer time and mental bandwidth that would be more productively spent on Tahoe-LAFS itself.
|
* maintaining our fork (which is necessary to avoid some of the bugs) takes up developer time and mental bandwidth that would be more productively spent on Tahoe-LAFS itself.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue