tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25

package Tahoe-LAFS for Fedora #170

New issue

Open

opened 2007-10-09 16:48:52 +00:00 by zooko · 8 comments

zooko commented

2007-10-09 16:48:52 +00:00

Owner

In theory, you can run "./setup.py bdist_rpm" and an "allmydata-tahoe.rpm" package will magically appear. In practice, I don't have access to an RPM-using operating system, so I can't try it.

If anybody tries that and reports the results here I would appreciate it!

In theory, you can run "./setup.py bdist_rpm" and an "allmydata-tahoe.rpm" package will magically appear. In practice, I don't have access to an RPM-using operating system, so I can't try it. If anybody tries that and reports the results here I would appreciate it!

tahoe-lafs added the

labels 2007-10-09 16:48:52 +00:00

tahoe-lafs added this to the 0.6.1 milestone 2007-10-09 16:48:52 +00:00

zooko commented

2007-10-13 06:16:24 +00:00

Author

Owner

Bumping this to v0.7.

tahoe-lafs modified the milestone from 0.6.1 to 0.7.0

2007-10-13 06:16:24 +00:00

zooko commented

2007-10-19 23:16:05 +00:00

Author

Owner

I don't want to do this, but I want somebody to do it for v0.6.2. Oh heck, I'll do it if someone will give me ssh access to a Fedora system. :-)

tahoe-lafs added

0.6.1

and removed

0.6.0

labels 2007-10-19 23:16:05 +00:00

zooko commented

2007-11-01 18:08:29 +00:00

Author

Owner

We're focussing on an imminent v0.7.0 (see the roadmap) which hopefully has [#197 #197 -- Small Distributed Mutable Files] and also a fix for [#199 #199 -- bad SHA-256]. So I'm bumping less urgent tickets to v0.7.1.

We're focussing on an imminent v0.7.0 (see [the roadmap](http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/roadmap)) which hopefully has [#197 #197 -- Small Distributed Mutable Files] and also a fix for [#199 #199 -- bad SHA-256]. So I'm bumping less urgent tickets to v0.7.1.

zooko commented

2007-11-13 18:32:46 +00:00

Author

Owner

We need to choose a manageable subset of desired improvements for v0.7.1, scheduled for two week hence, so I'm bumping this one into v0.7.2, scheduled for mid-December.

We need to choose a manageable subset of desired improvements for [v0.7.1](http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/milestone/0.7.1), scheduled for two week hence, so I'm bumping this one into [v0.7.2](http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/milestone/0.7.2), scheduled for mid-December.

tahoe-lafs added

0.7.0

and removed

0.6.1

labels 2007-11-13 18:32:46 +00:00

tahoe-lafs added this to the 0.8.0 (Allmydata 3.0 Beta) milestone 2008-01-23 04:22:11 +00:00

tahoe-lafs modified the milestone from 0.8.0 (Allmydata 3.0 Beta) to undecided

2008-03-08 02:07:12 +00:00

davidsarah commented

2010-04-04 16:53:40 +00:00

Author

Owner

Is this bug still relevant?

zooko commented

2010-04-04 17:18:25 +00:00

Author

Owner

Ruben Kerkhof has done a lot of work on packaging Tahoe-LAFS and its dependencies for Fedora. It looks like zfec and pycryptopp are approved for inclusion in Fedora!

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-zfec
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pycryptopp

Let's change the meaning of this ticket to packaging Tahoe-LAFS for Fedora and assign it to Ruben. :-)

Ruben Kerkhof has done a lot of work on packaging Tahoe-LAFS and its dependencies for Fedora. It looks like zfec and pycryptopp are approved for inclusion in Fedora! <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-zfec> <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pycryptopp> Let's change the meaning of this ticket to packaging Tahoe-LAFS for Fedora and assign it to Ruben. :-)

tahoe-lafs changed title from ~~build RPMs~~ to package Tahoe-LAFS for Fedora

2010-04-04 17:18:25 +00:00

tahoe-lafs added

normal

and removed

minor

labels 2013-07-19 21:07:01 +00:00

tahoe-lafs modified the milestone from eventually to soon (release n/a)

2013-07-19 21:07:01 +00:00

exarkun commented

2020-01-17 23:44:14 +00:00

Author