tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25
2
0
Issues 1.1k Wiki Activity

pycrypto gives bad output from SHA-256 for certain input lengths #199

New issue
Closed
opened 2007-11-01 17:08:23 +00:00 by zooko · 5 comments
zooko commented 2007-11-01 17:08:23 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

The implementation of SHA-256 in pycrypto (which we use in Tahoe <= v0.6.1) gives the wrong output if the input length % 64 is 55.

The plan is to fix this by either applying another patch to our version of pycrypto or switching to a different crypto library. Investigating the latter is why I am working on pycryptopp.

The implementation of SHA-256 in pycrypto (which we use in Tahoe <= v0.6.1) gives the wrong output if the input length % 64 is 55. The plan is to fix this by either applying another patch to our version of pycrypto or switching to a different crypto library. Investigating the latter is why I am working on [pycryptopp](http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2007-October/000215.html).
tahoe-lafs added the
unknown
blocker
defect
0.6.1
 labels 2007-11-01 17:08:23 +00:00
tahoe-lafs added this to the 0.7.0 milestone 2007-11-01 17:08:23 +00:00
tahoe-lafs added
code
 and removed
unknown
 labels 2007-11-07 05:32:59 +00:00
zooko commented 2007-11-07 05:56:11 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

(http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2007-November/000231.html)

Next step: update tahoe README to state that the user has to manually install Crypto++, and update the tahoe automatic dependencies to depend on pycryptopp, and change our calls to pycryto's sha256 to pycryptopp's sha256.

(http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2007-November/000231.html) Next step: update tahoe README to state that the user has to manually install Crypto++, and update the tahoe automatic dependencies to depend on pycryptopp, and change our calls to pycryto's sha256 to pycryptopp's sha256.
zooko commented 2007-11-07 20:31:14 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Next step -- figure out why it doesn't compile on Brian's Mac OS X.

Next step after that -- change uses of pycrypto's SHA-256 to pycryptopp's SHA-256.

Next step -- figure out why it doesn't compile on Brian's Mac OS X. Next step after that -- change uses of pycrypto's SHA-256 to pycryptopp's SHA-256.
zooko commented 2007-11-08 00:04:47 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Fixed by changeset:11412da436be9e37.

(Except possibly for build/porting/packaging errors on some systems -- see the loyal BuildBot for details.)

Fixed by changeset:11412da436be9e37. (Except possibly for build/porting/packaging errors on some systems -- see the loyal [BuildBot](wiki/BuildBot) for details.)
tahoe-lafs added the
fixed
 label 2007-11-08 00:04:47 +00:00
zooko closed this issue 2007-11-08 00:04:47 +00:00
zooko commented 2007-11-09 19:32:21 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

The version of pycryptopp that I used had a bug in the SHA-256 wrapper code. This bug is now fixed, so I'm now running tests and will re-apply this patch.

The version of pycryptopp that I used had a bug in the SHA-256 wrapper code. This bug is now fixed, so I'm now running tests and will re-apply this patch.
tahoe-lafs removed the
fixed
 label 2007-11-09 19:32:21 +00:00
zooko reopened this issue 2007-11-09 19:32:21 +00:00
zooko commented 2007-11-10 00:48:33 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

closed again by changeset:5807e83f7ba926af

closed again by changeset:5807e83f7ba926af
tahoe-lafs added the
fixed
 label 2007-11-10 00:48:33 +00:00
zooko closed this issue 2007-11-10 00:48:33 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
No results found.
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
0.2.0

   
0.3.0

   
0.4.0

   
0.5.0

   
0.5.1

   
0.6.0

   
0.6.1

   
0.7.0

   
0.8.0

   
0.9.0

   
1.0.0

   
1.1.0

   
1.10.0

   
1.10.1

   
1.10.2

   
1.10a2

   
1.11.0

   
1.12.0

   
1.12.1

   
1.13.0

   
1.14.0

   
1.15.0

   
1.15.1

   
1.2.0

   
1.3.0

   
1.4.1

   
1.5.0

   
1.6.0

   
1.6.1

   
1.7.0

   
1.7.1

   
1.7β

   
1.8.0

   
1.8.1

   
1.8.2

   
1.8.3

   
1.8β

   
1.9.0

   
1.9.0-s3branch

   
1.9.0a1

   
1.9.0a2

   
1.9.0b1

   
1.9.1

   
1.9.2

   
1.9.2a1

   
LeastAuthority.com automation

   
blocker

   
cannot reproduce

   
cloud-branch

   
code

catch-all for anything that can be fixed by writing code but isn't classified better

  
code-dirnodes

anything involving tahoe directories

  
code-encoding

immutable-file encoding format/layout, cap format, encoding/decoding algorithms

  
code-frontend

general frontend things: new user-facing interfaces, FTP/SFTP servers, FUSE-like interfaces

  
code-frontend-cli

CLI tools

  
code-frontend-ftp-sftp

   
code-frontend-magic-folder

   
code-frontend-web

webapi interfaces, user-facing "WUI" interfaces

  
code-mutable

anything involving mutable files: encoding/decoding, share format

  
code-network

Introducer, locating storage servers, establishing/maintaining connections to them

  
code-nodeadmin

node startup/shutdown, tools to create nodes, logging tools, management/monitoring tools, manhole, disk-space-limiting tools

  
code-peerselection

server selection/sorting algorithm, rebalancing code, allocation policy, swarming-download

  
code-storage

storage-server implementation, share-storage directory layout, client-to-server share transfer protocol

  
contrib

problems with non-core things that live in the source:contrib/ directory

  
critical

   
defect

   
dev-infrastructure

things that help us build Tahoe: buildbot, automated speed/memory/code-coverage tests and results-displayers, IRC channels, mailing lists, this Trac instance

  
documentation

docs items. Also use 'docs' keyword on tickets in more specific components.

  
duplicate

   
enhancement

   
fixed

   
invalid

   
major

   
minor

   
n/a

   
normal

   
operational

things involved in running a tahoe grid, external tools to monitor/maintain a grid (like "nodeadmin" but larger-scale). Was also used for issues with the allmydata.com grid.

  
packaging

setup.py script, library dependencies, binary packages, licensing, installation instructions

  
somebody else's problem

   
supercritical

   
task

   
trivial

   
unknown

Uncategorized. All tickets default to this component until someone updates it.

  
was already fixed

   
website

things about the tahoe-lafs.org website (and sometimes this Trac instance, shared with 'dev-infrastructure')

  
wontfix

   
worksforme
No labels
0.2.0
0.3.0
0.4.0
0.5.0
0.5.1
0.6.0
0.6.1
0.7.0
0.8.0
0.9.0
1.0.0
1.1.0
1.10.0
1.10.1
1.10.2
1.10a2
1.11.0
1.12.0
1.12.1
1.13.0
1.14.0
1.15.0
1.15.1
1.2.0
1.3.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.6.0
1.6.1
1.7.0
1.7.1
1.7β
1.8.0
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8β
1.9.0
1.9.0-s3branch
1.9.0a1
1.9.0a2
1.9.0b1
1.9.1
1.9.2
1.9.2a1
LeastAuthority.com automation
blocker
cannot reproduce
cloud-branch
code
code-dirnodes
code-encoding
code-frontend
code-frontend-cli
code-frontend-ftp-sftp
code-frontend-magic-folder
code-frontend-web
code-mutable
code-network
code-nodeadmin
code-peerselection
code-storage
contrib
critical
defect
dev-infrastructure
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
fixed
invalid
major
minor
n/a
normal
operational
packaging
somebody else's problem
supercritical
task
trivial
unknown
was already fixed
website
wontfix
worksforme
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
0.7.0
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#199
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?