# -> *
[Imported from Trac: page MeetingNotes_2012_10_23, version 6]
parent
37467596b9
commit
f65af8ceb3
|
@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ zooko suggests this test relies on the ResponseCache which the patch has removed
|
|||
david-sarah changes "self.old_map.best_recoverable_version()" to "n.get_best_readable_version()" to see a different error and asks if that's the expected error for this test.
|
||||
|
||||
zooko suggests the current test has four steps:
|
||||
# overwrite file
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# download again with the stale map
|
||||
* overwrite file
|
||||
* ?
|
||||
* ?
|
||||
* download again with the stale map
|
||||
|
||||
zooko: to make the test work, we need a stale map but we need the cache to be cleared (or not relied upon). Question: Where is it getting the data from the cache.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -77,9 +77,9 @@ Zooko: Rainhill design by David-Sarah needs review by crypto experts.
|
|||
David-Sarah: It might be possible to simplify Rainhill in some way.
|
||||
|
||||
Zooko: Possible approaches for rainhill:
|
||||
# document its security features
|
||||
# explain why the complexity is necessary for features
|
||||
# determine if simpler constructs achieve those features
|
||||
* document its security features
|
||||
* explain why the complexity is necessary for features
|
||||
* determine if simpler constructs achieve those features
|
||||
|
||||
Zooko: Wants to advertise rainhill for broader crypto community review. Suggests next week will be PoR topic, then the week after could be Rainhill; after some advertising.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue