From db22aae996a79ad1c6abf940a29acfc5459e50d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zooko <>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:05:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] remove link to percentage-code coverage graph -- it's a
 pretty useless graph

[Imported from Trac: page Dev, version 59]
---
 Dev.md | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Dev.md b/Dev.md
index 934cef1..f74f3b8 100644
--- a/Dev.md
+++ b/Dev.md
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ Views into the process of Tahoe hackery.
  * [The darcs patch browser](http://allmydata.org/darcs.cgi/tahoe/?c=browse) allows you to answer questions like "Which lines did this patch change?" and "Which patches changed this line?".
  * [/../../tahoe-figleaf/current The code coverage statistics] show which lines of code get exercised by the unit tests.
    * [/../../tahoe-figleaf Archived data] is also available.
-   * [/../../tahoe-figleaf-graph/hanford.allmydata.com-tahoe_figleaf.html This graph] shows how code coverage has changed over time, measuring what percentage of the [allmydata]source:src/allmydata codebase is covered.
    * [/../../tahoe-figleaf-graph/hanford.allmydata.com-tahoe_figleaf2.html This one] measures the number of lines that are **not** covered, which gives better resolution than the percentage-wise graph.
  * [The Packaging page](Packaging) shows our currently policy for how to re-use 3rd-party libraries and how to distribute Tahoe to users.
  * [How to Submit Patches](Patches)