literal caps and immutable directories
[Imported from Trac: page Capabilities, version 5]
parent
fef3a33b09
commit
7cbf0da4db
|
@ -1,18 +1,24 @@
|
||||||
# Capabilities
|
# Capabilities
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
An overview from the mailing list archives - originally [Feb 2009 - Brian Warner](http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2009-February/001110.html):
|
An overview from the mailing list archives - originally by [Feb 2009 - Brian Warner](http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2009-February/001110.html),
|
||||||
|
but updated to take into account literal caps and immutable directories:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
1: immutable file read-only capability string URI:CHK:
|
1: immutable file read-only capability string URI:CHK:
|
||||||
2: immutable file verify capability string URI:CHK-Verifier:
|
2: immutable file verify capability string URI:CHK-Verifier:
|
||||||
|
3: immutable LIT file read-only capability string URI:LIT:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3: mutable file read-write capability string URI:SSK:
|
4: mutable file read-write capability string URI:SSK:
|
||||||
4: mutable file read-only capability string URI:SSK-RO:
|
5: mutable file read-only capability string URI:SSK-RO:
|
||||||
5: mutable file verify capability string URI:SSK-Verifier:
|
6: mutable file verify capability string URI:SSK-Verifier:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
6: directory read-write capability string URI:DIR2:
|
7: immutable directory read-only capability string URI:DIR2-CHK:
|
||||||
7: directory read-only capability string URI:DIR2-RO:
|
8: immutable directory verify capability string URI:DIR2-CHK-Verifier:
|
||||||
8: directory verify capability string URI:DIR2-Verifier:
|
9: immutable LIT directory read-only capability string URI:DIR2-LIT:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
10: mutable directory read-write capability string URI:DIR2:
|
||||||
|
11: mutable directory read-only capability string URI:DIR2-RO:
|
||||||
|
12: mutable directory verify capability string URI:DIR2-Verifier:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In Tahoe, directories are built out of mutable files (a directory is really
|
In Tahoe, directories are built out of mutable files (a directory is really
|
||||||
just a particular way to interpret the contents of a given mutable file), and
|
just a particular way to interpret the contents of a given mutable file), and
|
||||||
|
@ -23,27 +29,31 @@ Some capabilities can be used to derive others. If you have #1, you can
|
||||||
derive #2 (but not the other way around). The full table is:
|
derive #2 (but not the other way around). The full table is:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#1 -> #2
|
#1 -> #2
|
||||||
#3->#4->#5
|
#4 -> #5 -> #6
|
||||||
#6->#7->#8
|
#7 -> #8
|
||||||
|
#10-> #11-> #12
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Deriving a weaker capability from a strong one is called "diminishing" the stronger one.
|
Deriving a weaker capability from a strong one is called "diminishing" the stronger one.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So we use "filecap" to talk about #1+#3+#4, but (since most files are
|
So we use "filecap" to talk about #1..6, but (since most files are immutable)
|
||||||
immutable) we're usually talking about #1. We use "dircap" to talk about #6
|
we're usually talking about #1. We use "dircap" to talk about #7..12.
|
||||||
and #7. We use "readcap" to talk about #1,#4, and #7, but usually we refer to
|
We use "readcap" to talk about #{1,3,5,7,9,11}, but usually we refer to
|
||||||
#7 as a "directory readcap". We use "writecap" to talk about #3 and #6.
|
#{7,9,11} as a "directory readcap". We use "writecap" to talk about #4 and #10.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A "literal cap" or "LIT cap" stores the contents of a small file (#3) or
|
||||||
|
directory (#9) in the capability itself.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A "verifycap" is the weakest capability that still allows every bit of every
|
A "verifycap" is the weakest capability that still allows every bit of every
|
||||||
share to be validated (hashes checked, signatures verified, etc). That means
|
share to be validated (hashes checked, signatures verified, etc). That means
|
||||||
#2, #5, and #8.
|
#{2,6,8,12}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When we talk about a "repaircap", we mean "the weakest capability that can
|
When we talk about a "repaircap", we mean "the weakest capability that can
|
||||||
still be used to repair the file". Given the current limitations of the
|
still be used to repair the file". Given the current limitations of the
|
||||||
repairer and our webapi, that means we're talking about #1, #3, or #6.
|
repairer and our webapi, that means we're talking about #{1,4,7,10}.
|
||||||
Eventually we'll fix this limitation, and any verifycap should be useable as
|
Eventually we'll fix this limitation, and any verifycap should be useable as
|
||||||
a repaircap too. (there's much less work involved to let #2 repair a file..
|
a repaircap too. (There's much less work involved to let #2 repair a file or
|
||||||
it's just an incomplete API, rather than a fundamental redesign of the server
|
#8 repair a directory... it's just an incomplete API, rather than a fundamental
|
||||||
protocol).
|
redesign of the server protocol.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We then use the somewhat-vague term "rootcap" to refer to a cap (usually a
|
We then use the somewhat-vague term "rootcap" to refer to a cap (usually a
|
||||||
directory write cap) that is not present inside any directory, so the only
|
directory write cap) that is not present inside any directory, so the only
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue