From 7748196f490e5e303c0f5dd5b9c1e8dadb7e7d6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: vikarti <>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:22:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] posting per IRC discussion. please update
[Imported from Trac: page FAQ, version 65]
---
FAQ.md | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/FAQ.md b/FAQ.md
index c6c372f..d77d3e9 100644
--- a/FAQ.md
+++ b/FAQ.md
@@ -156,4 +156,21 @@ Literal caps are supported for immutable files and immutable directories (see [t
**Q23: Can I access files stored in Tahoe-LAFS via FUSE?**
A:
-Yes. Tahoe-LAFS comes with an [SFTP server]source:docs/frontends/FTP-and-SFTP.rst. If you point [sshfs](http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html) at the SFTP server then you have access to Tahoe-LAFS through FUSE. Alternately, [pyfilesystem](pyFilesystem) interfaces directly with Tahoe-LAFS through the latter's [WAPI]source:docs/frontends/webapi.rst and provides both FUSE and Microsoft Windows filesystem access. See #1353 for discussion of possible improvements to FUSE integration. See [Zooko's post to freedombox-discuss](http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/2011-November/003162.html) and [Zooko's post to Google+](https://plus.google.com/108313527900507320366/posts/ZrgdgLhV3NG) for Zooko's ramblings about the advisability of using FUSE for distributed filesystems in general and Tahoe-LAFS in particular.
\ No newline at end of file
+Yes. Tahoe-LAFS comes with an [SFTP server]source:docs/frontends/FTP-and-SFTP.rst. If you point [sshfs](http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html) at the SFTP server then you have access to Tahoe-LAFS through FUSE. Alternately, [pyfilesystem](pyFilesystem) interfaces directly with Tahoe-LAFS through the latter's [WAPI]source:docs/frontends/webapi.rst and provides both FUSE and Microsoft Windows filesystem access. See #1353 for discussion of possible improvements to FUSE integration. See [Zooko's post to freedombox-discuss](http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/2011-November/003162.html) and [Zooko's post to Google+](https://plus.google.com/108313527900507320366/posts/ZrgdgLhV3NG) for Zooko's ramblings about the advisability of using FUSE for distributed filesystems in general and Tahoe-LAFS in particular.
+
+*'Q23: How I should setup k,h,N on my small private grid?*
+A:
+So you decided pubgrid is not for you and volgrid2 is not for you for one reason or another(note that they don't filled yet as of 6 Feb 2012) and want to knew which settings are for k,h,N.
+Also,assuming at least some of your nodes are on same LAN and others are widely distributed(VPSeses over internet,'recycled servers' from for example atlas networks, etc).
+And total number of nodes is not too big. And all your nodes under your control(at least - they are VPSes/Servers which are in your/friends you trust to pay in time name).And - if some storage nodes are permanently down - you can reconfigure gateways you use manually and run repair.
+
+Please note, it's much better to have nodes with roughly same space(500Gb and 5Gb in same grid is not a good idea,if you for some odd reason must have them both - read and think again,if you still think you must - don't count them in S in below calculations)
+Let's say S=number_of_nodes), setup k=3,N=S,h=N-2,
+use N=number_of_nodes_total, h=N-2
+
+
+following links can also be helpful:
+
+
+
+