tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25
2
0
Issues 1.1k Wiki Activity

Updated links to point to proper subdomain 

[Imported from Trac: page Performance, version 40]
brimstone 2013-11-15 14:47:23 +00:00
parent 44291f3d07
commit 210d7270e3
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
Performance.md

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ At about the same time Nathan Eisenberg of Atlas Networks did a couple of manual
Also François Deppierraz has run a few benchmarks. (Can't find a link to his results.)
Jeff Darcy benchmarked Tahoe-LAFS vs. his new CloudFS (based on Gluster) vs. encfs vs. ecryptfs vs. Gluster, using iozone: <https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cloudfs-devel/2011-June/000097.html> <https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cloudfs-devel/2011-June/000099.html>
Jeff Darcy benchmarked Tahoe-LAFS vs. his new CloudFS (based on Gluster) vs. encfs vs. ecryptfs vs. Gluster, using iozone: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cloudfs-devel/2011-June/000097.html> <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cloudfs-devel/2011-June/000099.html>
Ticket #932 (benchmark Tahoe-LAFS compared to nosql dbs) is a ticket to run the standard "YCSB" benchmarks for nosql databases on Tahoe-LAFS.