tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25

XML-RPC interface #48

New issue

Closed

opened 2007-05-21 19:19:26 +00:00 by zooko · 6 comments

zooko commented

2007-05-21 19:19:26 +00:00

Owner

Peter said he wanted an XML-RPC interface. Me, too! I nominate Brian to make one. ;-)

I've added a line to source:roadmap.txt about this. If you disagree or have other comments, Brian, please feel free to post to this ticket and to roadmap.txt.

Peter said he wanted an XML-RPC interface. Me, too! I nominate Brian to make one. ;-) I've added a line to source:roadmap.txt about this. If you disagree or have other comments, Brian, please feel free to post to this ticket and to roadmap.txt.

tahoe-lafs added the

code

major

enhancement

labels 2007-05-21 19:19:26 +00:00

zooko commented

2007-05-30 16:42:11 +00:00

Author

Owner

I'm raising the priority of this because I want it a lot and because #53 -- command-line interface -- could use this to connect to the daemon. See #60 about the question of what it means -- if anything -- to raise the priority of a ticket.

zooko commented

2007-06-28 15:57:08 +00:00

Author

Owner

This is assigned to me, and it is of high urgency.

tahoe-lafs added

blocker

and removed

major

labels 2007-06-28 15:57:08 +00:00

zooko commented

2007-07-01 03:45:25 +00:00

Author

Owner

Maybe I should have another look at WebDAV...

And we should definitely look at xuil (Brian is into this, too).

And the result might be more or less RESTful...

Maybe I should have another look at WebDAV... And we should definitely look at xuil (Brian is into this, too). And the result might be more or less RESTful...

warner commented

2007-07-11 22:27:19 +00:00

Author

Owner

since we have a working RESTful interface now, and since we're starting to write a CLI around it, I'm lowering the priority of this one.

tahoe-lafs added

major

and removed

blocker

labels 2007-07-11 22:27:19 +00:00

tahoe-lafs added

code-frontend-web

and removed

code

labels 2007-08-14 18:53:37 +00:00

tahoe-lafs added this to the undecided milestone 2007-10-10 23:16:40 +00:00

zooko commented

2007-10-19 23:10:51 +00:00

Author

Owner

I'll regain interest if I detect another customer who would prefer XML-RPC over [the RESTful interface]source:docs/webapi.txt.

I'm happy with [the RESTful interface]source:docs/webapi.txt, and so far our customers -- Dmitry and MikeB -- seem happy with it, and our CLI customer -- Zandr -- seems okay with the CLI, so I'm losing interest in writing another interface. I'll regain interest if I detect another customer who would prefer XML-RPC over [the RESTful interface]source:docs/webapi.txt.

tahoe-lafs added

trivial

and removed

major

labels 2007-10-19 23:10:51 +00:00

tahoe-lafs modified the milestone from eventually to undecided

2008-06-01 20:57:17 +00:00

zooko commented

2008-06-10 02:55:02 +00:00

Author

Owner

Closing this as wontfix -- the RESTful interface is sufficient for now. This ticket will be reopened if we decide we want an XML-RPC interface.

(By the way, I recently heard that Amazon, which launched with both XML-RPC and REST, has 85% REST usage.)

Closing this as wontfix -- the RESTful interface is sufficient for now. This ticket will be reopened if we decide we want an XML-RPC interface. (By the way, I recently heard that Amazon, which launched with both XML-RPC and REST, has 85% REST usage.)

tahoe-lafs added the

wontfix

label 2008-06-10 02:55:02 +00:00

zooko closed this issue

2008-06-10 02:55:02 +00:00