security flaw: directory server can escalate read access into write access #187

Closed
opened 2007-10-25 06:47:28 +00:00 by zooko · 2 comments
zooko commented 2007-10-25 06:47:28 +00:00
Owner

The current scheme to prevent users who haven't been granted write access from writing updates to directories doesn't prevent the server that hosts the directory from writing to it if the server has been granted read access to the directory.

That is: the intent is that you can grant a person read-only access while withholding read-write access, and this intent works as far as the person doesn't control the directory server, but if you grant read access to the directory server then it can also gain write access, which wasn't intended.

For example, the current test grid is configured so that everyone uses the same directory server (because the vdrive.furl file that you put into your node directory before you launch your node points to that server). If you give one of the allmydata folks a read-only view on a directory of yours, we can use that read access plus our control of the directory server to change the contents of your directory.

The current scheme to prevent users who haven't been granted write access from writing updates to directories doesn't prevent the server that hosts the directory from writing to it if the server has been granted read access to the directory. That is: the intent is that you can grant a person read-only access while withholding read-write access, and this intent works as far as the person doesn't control the directory server, but if you grant read access to the directory server then it can also gain write access, which wasn't intended. For example, the current test grid is configured so that everyone uses the same directory server (because the vdrive.furl file that you put into your node directory before you launch your node points to that server). If you give one of the allmydata folks a read-only view on a directory of yours, we can use that read access plus our control of the directory server to change the contents of your directory.
tahoe-lafs added the
unknown
critical
defect
0.6.1
labels 2007-10-25 06:47:28 +00:00
zooko commented 2007-11-01 17:09:48 +00:00
Author
Owner

[#197 Small Distributed Mutable Files] will fix this. Merging into #197.

[#197 Small Distributed Mutable Files] will fix this. Merging into #197.
tahoe-lafs added the
duplicate
label 2007-11-01 17:09:48 +00:00
zooko closed this issue 2007-11-01 17:09:48 +00:00
zooko commented 2007-11-01 18:12:49 +00:00
Author
Owner

Milestone 0.6.2 deleted

Milestone 0.6.2 deleted
tahoe-lafs added this to the 0.7.0 milestone 2007-11-01 18:12:49 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: tahoe-lafs/trac-2024-07-25#187
No description provided.